Israel

Archive for Tag “Israel”


Palestinians arming for war?

The Palestinian Authority is conventionally regarded as far less militant than Hamas. With that in mind:

Almost $1b., about 28 percent of the [Palestinian Authority] budget, will be spent on defense, compared to 16% for education and 10% for medical services. In other words, a bulk of the PA’s funds will not be used for schooling, health or infrastructure, but for procuring weapons and maintaining a massive military structure.

Odd how a “government which is not officially at war with Israel, and has no formal army” has opted to invest so much money in militarization. [Emphasis added]. Where is the money coming from?

To maintain their military budget, and payments to prisoners, the PA will need over $1b. in foreign aid. [...] In essence, the world’s most advanced democracies will be helping the Palestinian government advance their militancy and tyranny.

The article, by Nitsana Darshan-Leitner at the Jerusalem Post, also notes that some $60 million a year is to be spent to “reward terrorism against Israel,” in the form of “payments to the families of Palestinian Arab terrorists incarcerated in Israeli prisons.” (On links between foreign aid and Palestinian militancy, see also this post from a while back.)

The whole article is well worth reading.


Flotilla raid to blame?

President Obama’s March mission to coax an apology from Israel for the 2010 flotilla raid that left eight Turks dead has brought the decrepit state of Turkish-Israeli relations back into the spotlight.

According to the popular narrative, the Israeli decision to confront the boats with maritime commandos was not only unjustified and reprehensible, but also drove a wedge between the two states, ruining a once-cooperative relationship.

The truth, though, is that the relationship was crumbling long before 2010. And not on any fault of the Israelis.

Turkey expert Michael Rubin, of the American Enterprise Institute, argues that the secular, relatively-free Turkey that Israel had come to trust began to disappear as early as 2002, when the Islamist Justice and Development Party won Turkey’s general election. Over the next decade, he writes, Turkey underwent a methodical revolution that transformed it from a staunchly secular state, to an Islamic one:

Gone, and gone permanently, is secular Turkey, a unique Muslim country that straddled East and West and that even maintained a cooperative relationship with Israel. Today Turkey is an Islamic republic whose government saw fit to facilitate the May 31 flotilla raid on Israel’s blockade of Gaza. Turkey is now more aligned to Iran than to the democracies of Europe. Whereas Iran’s Islamic revolution shocked the world with its suddenness in 1979, Turkey’s Islamic revolution has been so slow and deliberate as to pass almost unnoticed. Nevertheless, the Islamic Republic of Turkey is a reality—and a danger.

Since the 2002 election of the Justice and Development Party, Turkey’s increasingly theocratic orientation has expressed itself in the form of antagonism against Israel. One way this has been manifest is in Turkey’s dealings with Israel’s enemies. In addition to aligning itself with Iran, Turkey has effectively endorsed Hamas by inviting its leader Khaled Meshaal to meetings in Ankara in 2006 and then, of course, sponsoring the blockade-challenging flotilla in 2010.

Taking account of these observations, the deterioration of Turkish-Israeli relations has to do with a more consequential factor, which predates the flotilla raid: Turkey’s embrace of a hostile ideology.


Islamists Rising in the Middle East: Where next for America? [Event]

For readers in northern California: on April 11 at U.C. Davis I’ll be part of a panel on the rise of Islamists in the the Middle East, with Daniel Pipes, president of the Middle East Forum, and Larry Greenfield, Senior Fellow at the American Freedom Alliance. Here’s the event description:

Since the so-called Arab Spring, upheavals and revolutions have racked the Middle East. So far, the Islamist movement has gained not only greater prominence but also political power in Egypt and elsewhere. Amid the tumult in Egypt, the Syrian civil war, and an imminently nuclear-capable Iran, what are America’s interests in the region? What’s fueling the rise of Islamists, and how should we view them?

Where are things heading in the Israel-Palestinian conflict? What should America’s policy be toward the region, and toward Israel in particular?

Join the panel for a discussion of these and related questions.

The Facebook event page provides the info on time and venue.


How European nations enable Hezbollah

Hizbollah_flagThe Wall Street Journal reports:

Bulgaria’s government is expected to release an investigative report this week blaming the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah and its ally Iran for a terrorist bombing last summer that killed five Israeli tourists.

When you dig into the backstory, what’s curious is not that Hezbollah and Iran are implicated, but that there’s in effect a third party that deserves some blame: a pair of EU nations.

The U.S. and Israel rightly designate Hezbollah as a terrorist organization, but France and Germany do not. And they have pressured Bulgaria to avoid fingering Hezbollah for the attack last summer, because, well, that would be just so awkward. Why?

A sort of modus vivendi exists where Hezbollah keeps a low profile for its fund-raising and other activities and Europeans do not crack down. In Germany alone, some 950 people have been identified as being associated with the organization as of 2011. The group has always been treated as a benign force, even if assessments of the danger it presented varied greatly. [New York Times]

So for years now, Hezbollah has enjoyed unearned legitimacy and free rein to operate on European soil. That connivance typically relies on the claim that Hezbollah has a political wing and a distinct, separate military wing. In reality, the political side, which includes charities and medical care, is integral to the group’s ideological goal. The social services establish the group’s fidelity to Islamic morals (e.g., aiding the poor) and attract recruits for, and build loyalty to, the cause of jihad. Treating these two wings as separate is a rationalization, useful if your goal is to pass off a vicious organization as somehow non-vicious.

Even if the Hezbollah agents behind the Bulgaria attack had never set foot in France or Germany, for permitting the Islamist organization to raise funds and function within their territory, these governments should be branded as accessories to Hezbollah’s crimes.


Journo in Journal of International Security Affairs

FW2012coverOnly_web_smMy colleague, Elan Journo, has written a book review for the Fall/Winter 2012 issue of the Journal of International Security Affairs. Mr. Journo reviews Peter Berkowitz’s Israel and the Struggle over the International Laws of War.

He writes in the review:

By exposing what he regards as abuses of the international laws of war, Berkowitz intends to contribute to their defense. The book’s evidence, though, renders that hope forlorn.

Read the entire book review here.


Background on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Is there no way to resolve this perennial conflict? Are both sides morally equivalent? The United States seems to support Israel but does it really and why should it? For those interested, I recommend this older but clearly still relevant lecture by Yaron Brook, “The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: What is the solution?”  Dr. Brook’s talk is from 2002 but sadly, little seems to have changed over the last 10 years. (For a more recent take on the Obama administration’s approach to this age-old conflict, please see this talk by Dr. Brook on “Washington v. Jerusalem”.)


The Mideast’s real “apartheid”?

Think of some of the most tyrannical regimes you’ve heard of–ones that enforce racist policies, deny their subjects basic freedoms, condone slavery. Now suppose that they concoct and push a story ascribing their own crimes to a regime that in fact respects individual rights. Would anyone believe that? Would anyone let the tyrannies downplay their own oppressive record and damn an unjustly accused state?

Sadly, yes, argues this incisive oped by Efraim Karsh, a Middle East scholar. Responding to “Israel Apartheid Week” which is going on at college campuses, Karsh contends that the “apartheid” charge against Israel “is not only completely false but the inverse of the truth.

If apartheid is indeed a crime against humanity, Israel actually is the only apartheid-free state in the Middle East – a state whose Arab population enjoys full equality before the law and more prerogatives than most ethnic minorities in the free world, from the designation of Arabic as an official language to the recognition of non-Jewish religious holidays as legal days of rest.

By contrast, apartheid has been an integral part of the Middle East for over a millennium, and its Arab and Muslim nations continue to legally, politically and socially enforce this discriminatory practice against their hapless minorities.

Well worth reading; the whole thing is here.


9/11–A Decade Later [video]

Last month in Washington D.C., ARC hosted a symposium to explore American foreign policy in the post-9/11 decade. For those who were unable to attend live or to watch the live streamed video, below are the videos of the three panel discussions.

Upheavals in the Middle East: Assessing the political landscape

The Islamist Threat: From AfPak to Jyllands-Posten and Times Square

Iran, Israel and the West


A Palestinian state?

At the United Nations this week, the Palestinians will ask for — and possibly get — endorsement for their own independent state. But first, a quick reality check on what a Palestinian state means. This seven-part report from the Middle East Media Research Institute documents the rule of Hamas since it took over Gaza — in a bloody civil war — four years ago. To draw a brief sketch: Hamas has arbitrarily seized private land and bulldozed homes; censored the press; mocked freedom of assembly; killed political opponents (including those accused of “collaboration” with Israel); exploited civilians and private homes as human shields for armaments; imposed sharia law; and colluded in and carried out rocket attacks on Israel. And so the Islamists of Hamas have followed in the footsteps of the rival faction, the Fatah/PLO, which under Yasser Arafat had built up a horrifically repressive dictatorial regime. Arafat’s successor, Mahmoud Abbas, whose faction nominally has authority over parts of the West Bank, is known to celebrate suicide bombers, even honoring terrorists by naming streets after them.

For Palestinian leaders to demand a state of their own in order to sanctify their tyrannical rule is perverse.


911–A Decade Later: Lessons for the Future

It has been a decade since the Sept. 11 attacks shocked and angered our nation. What lessons have we learned since then? ARC will be hosting a symposium on this subject, titled “Sept. 11—A Decade Later: Lessons for the Future,” on September 8, in Washington, D.C. The program will feature three panel discussions, presenting a range of viewpoints.

If you can’t make this event, it will also be streamed live over the web starting at 1p.m. ET.

Check out the panel topics and speakers on the event’s site. You can also watch the live stream of the event from there.

On ARC’s Facebook page, you can read, watch, and listen to ARI’s numerous efforts throughout the last decade to push for an egoist foreign policy that puts the lives and individual rights of Americans first.