Comments on: Sotomayor unqualified for Supreme Court

By: amnd

amnd — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 04:50:58 +0000

My previous comment was sent (or lost) because the page just reset itself. but, the core of that post was: where were you when Judge Sam Alito (at his hearing) made the statement his immigrant origin influenced his legal decisions – or does come into account in his decision? What did you say, then?
Talking double standard! or BS politics?

Yours

By: Jeff Perren

Jeff Perren — Fri, 29 May 2009 18:56:06 +0000

Kudos on your remarks on the Sotomayer nomination. It’s a sad day when a vice (or, at best, self-confessed limitation) is regarded as both inevitable and a superior quality in a SCOTUS pick. Though we both know there is little likelihood of Sotomayer not being confirmed, it’s always important to speak the truth. One never knows what beneficial effect it may have down the road. Thank you for saying it.

Respectfully,
Jeff Perren
http://shavingleviathan.blogspot.com

By: Tom Bowden On Sotomayor « The Mike Slater Show

Tom Bowden On Sotomayor « The Mike Slater Show — Fri, 29 May 2009 14:51:45 +0000

[...] Tom Bowden On Sotomayor Jump to Comments Tom Bowden from the Ayn Rand Center: [...]

By: Who’s Most Likely To Hide From The Press During The Sotomayor Confirmation Hearings? | North Carolina Real Estate

Fri, 29 May 2009 09:55:07 +0000

[...] looks like it was written by Glenn Beck and Ann Coulter. She’s pointing her followers to this post from the Ayn Rand Center regarding the Sotomayor nomination. Judge Sonia Sotomayor, recently nominated for the Supreme Court [...]

By: Sotomayor « www.jakobdlouhy.com

Sotomayor « www.jakobdlouhy.com — Thu, 28 May 2009 23:07:28 +0000

[...] uttolka de värden som är skyddade i och med den amerikanska konstitutionen läser jag på bloggen Voices for Reason: “Judge Sonia Sotomayor, recently nominated for the Supreme Court seat being vacated by the [...]

By: Sotomayor — The New Clarion

Sotomayor — The New Clarion — Thu, 28 May 2009 20:41:02 +0000

[...] Tom Bowden goes deeper philosophically to show that Sotomayor’s multiculturalism rejects objectivity and impartiality. [...]

By: A Voice of Opposition to Sonia Sotomayor « Scott Holleran’s Blog

A Voice of Opposition to Sonia Sotomayor « Scott Holleran’s Blog — Thu, 28 May 2009 05:38:29 +0000

[...] best argument against approving Judge Sonia Sotomayor as a member of the Supreme Court. His thesis, presented in this post to ARC’s blog, Voices for Reason, is that Judge Sotomayor is unqualified to serve on the Supreme [...]

By: Larry Sussman

Larry Sussman — Wed, 27 May 2009 23:02:44 +0000

Forget the Supremes, shouldn’t her lack of objectivity and impartiality preclude her from the bench on any level? Saying yes to Sotomayor’s philosophy puts our whole nation’s judicial system into peril and chaos.

By: Daiva Gaulyte

Daiva Gaulyte — Wed, 27 May 2009 18:32:32 +0000

Wow!
Yesterday when i read on the news, I was thinking how is it relevent that she is Latino, which was emphasized in the article. After reading your article I’m horrified, makes me through up. I’m Lithuanian and been living in soviet union all my life untill it broke and I came to US. It is hard to imagine to me how most americans don’t see where is this country going. It is very sad.
Thank you for your writings!
With respect,
Daiva Gaulyte

By: James Wadsworth

James Wadsworth — Wed, 27 May 2009 17:17:25 +0000

Not only is she not qualified to serve on the Supreme Court, she is unqualified to serve on any court. I hope as you follow this story you will research her past rulings and expose her injustices. Thanks.