<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: North Korea&#8217;s test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/north-koreas-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/north-koreas-test/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:44:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/north-koreas-test/comment-page-1/#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/?p=2209#comment-646</guid>
		<description>I was watching a Korean drama series recently and came across this scene, between the deposed Korean King, Kumwa, and the usurper, his son, Taeso.  It is about appeasing a neighboring state, the Han (China), who are making demands and threats.  It is an excellent, succinct statement about what&#039;s wrong with appeasement:

Kumwa: I heard the Han demanded a hostage. Is that true?

Taeso: Yes.

Kumwa: What will you do?

Taeso: I&#039;m going to send a hostage.

Kumwa: Don&#039;t you have any pride?

Taeso: Why wouldn&#039;t I have any?

Kumwa: Yet you&#039;re going to send a hostage and accept that we&#039;re a tributary state?

Taeso: We can&#039;t afford to talk about pride. The Han is just waiting for a chance to make us pay for the war. I had to marry a woman I don&#039;t love just to put an end to it. If one hostage will save thousands of lives, why not? Your Majesty, pride won&#039;t stop a war. I&#039;ll reap the benefits of not starting one.

Kumwa: Give up one thing to avoid a war and the Han will demand something else. You&#039;ll use Puyo&#039;s peace as an excuse to back out again and again until you&#039;re at a dead end. What will you give them then? Will you let them conquer us if they want to? Will you die for them if they ask you to? Can&#039;t you see the reality hidden behind the so-called benefits?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was watching a Korean drama series recently and came across this scene, between the deposed Korean King, Kumwa, and the usurper, his son, Taeso.  It is about appeasing a neighboring state, the Han (China), who are making demands and threats.  It is an excellent, succinct statement about what&#8217;s wrong with appeasement:</p>
<p>Kumwa: I heard the Han demanded a hostage. Is that true?</p>
<p>Taeso: Yes.</p>
<p>Kumwa: What will you do?</p>
<p>Taeso: I&#8217;m going to send a hostage.</p>
<p>Kumwa: Don&#8217;t you have any pride?</p>
<p>Taeso: Why wouldn&#8217;t I have any?</p>
<p>Kumwa: Yet you&#8217;re going to send a hostage and accept that we&#8217;re a tributary state?</p>
<p>Taeso: We can&#8217;t afford to talk about pride. The Han is just waiting for a chance to make us pay for the war. I had to marry a woman I don&#8217;t love just to put an end to it. If one hostage will save thousands of lives, why not? Your Majesty, pride won&#8217;t stop a war. I&#8217;ll reap the benefits of not starting one.</p>
<p>Kumwa: Give up one thing to avoid a war and the Han will demand something else. You&#8217;ll use Puyo&#8217;s peace as an excuse to back out again and again until you&#8217;re at a dead end. What will you give them then? Will you let them conquer us if they want to? Will you die for them if they ask you to? Can&#8217;t you see the reality hidden behind the so-called benefits?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

