<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is it time to &#8220;go Galt&#8221;? No</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/is-it-time-to-go-galt-no/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/is-it-time-to-go-galt-no/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 05:03:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Kilmarx</title>
		<link>http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/is-it-time-to-go-galt-no/comment-page-1/#comment-859</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Kilmarx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 03:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/?p=1576#comment-859</guid>
		<description>On July 30th, Conservatives are &quot;Going Galt&quot;. On that date, Tea Party Nation is asking Conservatives all across the nation to &quot;Call in Conservative&quot;. On July 30th, Conservatives will not work, we will not buy. Instead, we will spend time with our families and friends. We will show President Obama and Congress who REALLY drives this economy. For more information on &quot;A Day Without Conservatives please visit www.teapartynation.com .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On July 30th, Conservatives are &#8220;Going Galt&#8221;. On that date, Tea Party Nation is asking Conservatives all across the nation to &#8220;Call in Conservative&#8221;. On July 30th, Conservatives will not work, we will not buy. Instead, we will spend time with our families and friends. We will show President Obama and Congress who REALLY drives this economy. For more information on &#8220;A Day Without Conservatives please visit <a href="http://www.teapartynation.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.teapartynation.com</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Norris</title>
		<link>http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/is-it-time-to-go-galt-no/comment-page-1/#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Norris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/?p=1576#comment-790</guid>
		<description>What can we in Canada   DO   to get  Ayn Rand s   ie  John Galt  point across ??               They  you know who I mean        are so difficult to   speak to.     PN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can we in Canada   DO   to get  Ayn Rand s   ie  John Galt  point across ??               They  you know who I mean        are so difficult to   speak to.     PN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is it time to go Galt No VOICES for REASON &#124; Wood TV Stand</title>
		<link>http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/is-it-time-to-go-galt-no/comment-page-1/#comment-655</link>
		<dc:creator>Is it time to go Galt No VOICES for REASON &#124; Wood TV Stand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 21:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/?p=1576#comment-655</guid>
		<description>[...] Is it time to go Galt No VOICES for REASON   Posted by root 36 minutes ago (http://blog.aynrandcenter.org)        Apr 9 2009 this is supposed to be in homage to the hero of atlas shrugged john galt and the strike he stand on your own as much as if you moved to a separate valley like in atlas shrugged send a comment to the author name e mail your comment voices for re        Discuss&#160;  &#124;&#160; Bury &#124;&#160;    News &#124; Is it time to go Galt No VOICES for REASON [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is it time to go Galt No VOICES for REASON   Posted by root 36 minutes ago (<a href="http://blog.aynrandcenter.org" rel="nofollow">http://blog.aynrandcenter.org</a>)        Apr 9 2009 this is supposed to be in homage to the hero of atlas shrugged john galt and the strike he stand on your own as much as if you moved to a separate valley like in atlas shrugged send a comment to the author name e mail your comment voices for re        Discuss&nbsp;  |&nbsp; Bury |&nbsp;    News | Is it time to go Galt No VOICES for REASON [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Chico</title>
		<link>http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/is-it-time-to-go-galt-no/comment-page-1/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Chico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 02:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/?p=1576#comment-495</guid>
		<description>Yes, Rand&#039;s right, we must check and question everything our elders has taught us and I think you are also right that we should not simply mimic Galt&#039;s actions. And it is also true that the sanction of the victims is, most of the time, the one thing the looters need to execute their plans. But that is not always the case. Let me illustrate: Every now and then, in any country you can think of, there are legislatures and tax increases that hinder honest working citizens from achieving their happiness. The point there being, sometimes, the looter&#039;s government points its guns at us. Another example: I live here in the Philippines and my taxes, though at the minimum level, I still feel it&#039;s burden when I can&#039;t buy what I want and the producers are being taxed almost about everything and in effect, the prices increase as well. And the money doesn&#039;t even really benefit to those who have contributed. Instead, it&#039;s going down the drain to moochers in the slums who won&#039;t lift a finger to get themselves out of poverty. The primary weapon we give them is our sanction, our consent and it is either begged out of our hands or taken from us by force. 

What we ought to do is detach ourselves from those who try to do us harm. I will hate to see those men of the mind suffer but as long as they do not ask for my help and they think what they are doing is right, I cannot do anything about their suffering. Only those who are sick and tired of their neighbors mooching their money and consequentially, their life are only those who will listen and we can help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Rand&#8217;s right, we must check and question everything our elders has taught us and I think you are also right that we should not simply mimic Galt&#8217;s actions. And it is also true that the sanction of the victims is, most of the time, the one thing the looters need to execute their plans. But that is not always the case. Let me illustrate: Every now and then, in any country you can think of, there are legislatures and tax increases that hinder honest working citizens from achieving their happiness. The point there being, sometimes, the looter&#8217;s government points its guns at us. Another example: I live here in the Philippines and my taxes, though at the minimum level, I still feel it&#8217;s burden when I can&#8217;t buy what I want and the producers are being taxed almost about everything and in effect, the prices increase as well. And the money doesn&#8217;t even really benefit to those who have contributed. Instead, it&#8217;s going down the drain to moochers in the slums who won&#8217;t lift a finger to get themselves out of poverty. The primary weapon we give them is our sanction, our consent and it is either begged out of our hands or taken from us by force. </p>
<p>What we ought to do is detach ourselves from those who try to do us harm. I will hate to see those men of the mind suffer but as long as they do not ask for my help and they think what they are doing is right, I cannot do anything about their suffering. Only those who are sick and tired of their neighbors mooching their money and consequentially, their life are only those who will listen and we can help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey Martynowski</title>
		<link>http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/is-it-time-to-go-galt-no/comment-page-1/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey Martynowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/?p=1576#comment-482</guid>
		<description>Mr. Watkins, 

Good commentary.  I do not fully agree, but I think you bring up the point that we need to understand fully what &quot;Going Galt&quot; means.  I believe it means different things to different people.

Some people may misinterpret the reasons for Rand&#039;s character&#039;s actions.  I think, though, that I&#039;m happy at least people are noticing a bad trend in society.  Maybe this will bring to people&#039;s minds the absolute travesty that our society is becoming.

You seem to imply that rather than take action, we first need understanding.  I agree, but understanding will not help us if our freedoms are being squashed by the larger gang. Action, to one degree or another, is needed.  When you say &quot;fight for Galt&#039;s ideas,&quot; I think that&#039;s what these people who want to &quot;go Galt&quot; are calling for, with no direction other than to follow his actions.  We need an alternative.  

You are completely correct, and just cutting back production is not what is needed.  The reality is, though, there are some who are doing it without even knowing anything about the &quot;going Galt&quot; movement.  They are doing it because they are secure enough with themselves and no longer see the benefit to working hard at their professions or continuing to push their small businesses farther.  They are ready to retire with no worthwhile results to their additional labor.  

I feel as if these people are the true leaders of our movement, without even knowing it.  They do these things not to make some big point, but because they logically came to that conclusion on their own.

Purposely harming yourself by not adding to society is, in fact, missing the point.  But these people who are pushed over the edge by taxation and tremendous future debts are not wrong in shutting down or cutting back production.  I certainly do not disagree with their actions and only encourage them to do what is best for their own selves.  

Thank you for your insightful view and use of actual quotes and logic.  It is a breath of fresh air in a world where we pass over things as fact when in reality they are just accepted norms.

Sincerely,

Joey Martynowski
http://thelastcapitalist.wordpress.com
jemartynowski@gmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Watkins, </p>
<p>Good commentary.  I do not fully agree, but I think you bring up the point that we need to understand fully what &#8220;Going Galt&#8221; means.  I believe it means different things to different people.</p>
<p>Some people may misinterpret the reasons for Rand&#8217;s character&#8217;s actions.  I think, though, that I&#8217;m happy at least people are noticing a bad trend in society.  Maybe this will bring to people&#8217;s minds the absolute travesty that our society is becoming.</p>
<p>You seem to imply that rather than take action, we first need understanding.  I agree, but understanding will not help us if our freedoms are being squashed by the larger gang. Action, to one degree or another, is needed.  When you say &#8220;fight for Galt&#8217;s ideas,&#8221; I think that&#8217;s what these people who want to &#8220;go Galt&#8221; are calling for, with no direction other than to follow his actions.  We need an alternative.  </p>
<p>You are completely correct, and just cutting back production is not what is needed.  The reality is, though, there are some who are doing it without even knowing anything about the &#8220;going Galt&#8221; movement.  They are doing it because they are secure enough with themselves and no longer see the benefit to working hard at their professions or continuing to push their small businesses farther.  They are ready to retire with no worthwhile results to their additional labor.  </p>
<p>I feel as if these people are the true leaders of our movement, without even knowing it.  They do these things not to make some big point, but because they logically came to that conclusion on their own.</p>
<p>Purposely harming yourself by not adding to society is, in fact, missing the point.  But these people who are pushed over the edge by taxation and tremendous future debts are not wrong in shutting down or cutting back production.  I certainly do not disagree with their actions and only encourage them to do what is best for their own selves.  </p>
<p>Thank you for your insightful view and use of actual quotes and logic.  It is a breath of fresh air in a world where we pass over things as fact when in reality they are just accepted norms.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Joey Martynowski<br />
<a href="http://thelastcapitalist.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://thelastcapitalist.wordpress.com</a><br />
<a href="mailto:jemartynowski@gmail.com">jemartynowski@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm</title>
		<link>http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/is-it-time-to-go-galt-no/comment-page-1/#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/?p=1576#comment-464</guid>
		<description>We have not yet lost our 2nd amendment free speech but I believe the witch doctor and his strong arms are planning to take it from us. Those of us that believe in freedom and our rights as individuals should be seriously thinking about withdrawing ourselves from the resource pool. Discouraging fellow thinkers from considering it is a mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have not yet lost our 2nd amendment free speech but I believe the witch doctor and his strong arms are planning to take it from us. Those of us that believe in freedom and our rights as individuals should be seriously thinking about withdrawing ourselves from the resource pool. Discouraging fellow thinkers from considering it is a mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Finney</title>
		<link>http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/is-it-time-to-go-galt-no/comment-page-1/#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Finney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/?p=1576#comment-434</guid>
		<description>I would contend that the dollars that are being withheld from the market today, sitting safely in the pockets of those who had previously produced it in huge quantities, is in protest to the actions of the government. This is those producers NOT participating in their enslavement. In my opinion, it is the right and just action for them to take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would contend that the dollars that are being withheld from the market today, sitting safely in the pockets of those who had previously produced it in huge quantities, is in protest to the actions of the government. This is those producers NOT participating in their enslavement. In my opinion, it is the right and just action for them to take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Calandruccio</title>
		<link>http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/is-it-time-to-go-galt-no/comment-page-1/#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Calandruccio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 14:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/?p=1576#comment-426</guid>
		<description>There is much insight and wisdom to the content of your article. However, outside the ideals of philosophy in which the purity of concepts and premises must be preserved, as you aptly do, there is the creeping cancer of the lobster pot of socialism et al.  Individuals ultimately find themselves ineffective in the gradual eradication of their liberties and thus the victims of its effect.  The call to action, even if improperly phrased in &quot;Go Galt&quot;, is always with us in a society falling short of the ideals of capitalism within a guilt-free moral culture of reason.  Lowering productivity is self- destructive, indeed, but as we find ourselves living inextricably within an economy we must find ways to contribute solely to those principals that we hope to sustain - NOT in sustanance to those that are even more self-destructive.  Your thoughts on this would be appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is much insight and wisdom to the content of your article. However, outside the ideals of philosophy in which the purity of concepts and premises must be preserved, as you aptly do, there is the creeping cancer of the lobster pot of socialism et al.  Individuals ultimately find themselves ineffective in the gradual eradication of their liberties and thus the victims of its effect.  The call to action, even if improperly phrased in &#8220;Go Galt&#8221;, is always with us in a society falling short of the ideals of capitalism within a guilt-free moral culture of reason.  Lowering productivity is self- destructive, indeed, but as we find ourselves living inextricably within an economy we must find ways to contribute solely to those principals that we hope to sustain &#8211; NOT in sustanance to those that are even more self-destructive.  Your thoughts on this would be appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lionell Griffith</title>
		<link>http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/is-it-time-to-go-galt-no/comment-page-1/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Lionell Griffith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/?p=1576#comment-421</guid>
		<description>In the 50 years since Atlas Shrugged was published, it has become more of a script than a warning.  The parallels in the closing chapters compared to the present administration are more than ominous.  Agreed, neither the tunnel nor the bridge has collapsed and there is no Galt&#039;s Gulch but the principles at work are identical.

When faced with the irrational and non-rational, one uses reason for self protection and not in an attempt to persuade the irrational and non-rational.  In other words. What you don&#039;t have, they can&#039;t steal.  What you don&#039;t produce, they can&#039;t tax.  Get out of debt.  Stay out of debt.  Don&#039;t be a tall daisy. 

Yes, you must fight for Galt&#039;s ideas.  However, part of that fight is stopping the feeding of the parasites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the 50 years since Atlas Shrugged was published, it has become more of a script than a warning.  The parallels in the closing chapters compared to the present administration are more than ominous.  Agreed, neither the tunnel nor the bridge has collapsed and there is no Galt&#8217;s Gulch but the principles at work are identical.</p>
<p>When faced with the irrational and non-rational, one uses reason for self protection and not in an attempt to persuade the irrational and non-rational.  In other words. What you don&#8217;t have, they can&#8217;t steal.  What you don&#8217;t produce, they can&#8217;t tax.  Get out of debt.  Stay out of debt.  Don&#8217;t be a tall daisy. </p>
<p>Yes, you must fight for Galt&#8217;s ideas.  However, part of that fight is stopping the feeding of the parasites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/is-it-time-to-go-galt-no/comment-page-1/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 10:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/?p=1576#comment-419</guid>
		<description>Don, people are trying to rally under the banner of objectivism, and over and over, I see the &#039;orthodox&#039; objectivists nipping them at the bud. When the guys tossed the tea overboard in Boston, were they cognizant of the distinction between a moral revolt and a superficial one? Of course not, they probably don&#039;t even know what the word superficial means. Their nature revolted against the idea of a moocher taking even more. That&#039;s what is happening now with Go-Galt.

People are trying to wrap themselves around objectivism because it really is a wonderfully laid philosophical system to build a life upon. If offers clarity; however, the cardinals of objectivism need to realize that real leadership for this cause also includes an encouraging tone, not snide remark about superficiality from the pulpit. If the objectivist movement is to flourish, it needs leaders who encourage and correct (gently).  Yea you may think they&#039;re mentally weak because only children need coddling, but that&#039;s an unproductive sentiment if you really want to lead a movement. Children need to be raised, otherwise they&#039;ll probably never reach objectivist adulthood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don, people are trying to rally under the banner of objectivism, and over and over, I see the &#8216;orthodox&#8217; objectivists nipping them at the bud. When the guys tossed the tea overboard in Boston, were they cognizant of the distinction between a moral revolt and a superficial one? Of course not, they probably don&#8217;t even know what the word superficial means. Their nature revolted against the idea of a moocher taking even more. That&#8217;s what is happening now with Go-Galt.</p>
<p>People are trying to wrap themselves around objectivism because it really is a wonderfully laid philosophical system to build a life upon. If offers clarity; however, the cardinals of objectivism need to realize that real leadership for this cause also includes an encouraging tone, not snide remark about superficiality from the pulpit. If the objectivist movement is to flourish, it needs leaders who encourage and correct (gently).  Yea you may think they&#8217;re mentally weak because only children need coddling, but that&#8217;s an unproductive sentiment if you really want to lead a movement. Children need to be raised, otherwise they&#8217;ll probably never reach objectivist adulthood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
