<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greens against green energy&#8211;follow-up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/greens-against-green-energy-follow-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/greens-against-green-energy-follow-up/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 07:57:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: yuval Brandstetter MD</title>
		<link>http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/greens-against-green-energy-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-2376</link>
		<dc:creator>yuval Brandstetter MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/?p=5276#comment-2376</guid>
		<description>You misunderstand Feinstein&#039;s grievance. She does not care for the &quot;monument&quot; which is a thousand times larger than any project planned in it. She is opposed to corporations or any business groups actually making a profit, even if it is for grenn energy. She is anti-business, regrdless of what business it is. 
As for the energy free market, sure, the free market will eschew high-investment solar and any other non-fossil fuel alternative as long as it can foist the implications of heating up and polluting the air as a government responsibility. Suppose all asthmatics in the US sued the coal fired plants for making them sick, could the coal-fired plants survive this onsalught without raising energy prices to &quot;green&quot; levels? That is where responsible government steps in, and channels the inventiveness of the business and scientific community into non-heat, non pollution energy competitive with fossil-fuel burners in the real world. The world where we breath the products of coal-fired stacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You misunderstand Feinstein&#8217;s grievance. She does not care for the &#8220;monument&#8221; which is a thousand times larger than any project planned in it. She is opposed to corporations or any business groups actually making a profit, even if it is for grenn energy. She is anti-business, regrdless of what business it is.<br />
As for the energy free market, sure, the free market will eschew high-investment solar and any other non-fossil fuel alternative as long as it can foist the implications of heating up and polluting the air as a government responsibility. Suppose all asthmatics in the US sued the coal fired plants for making them sick, could the coal-fired plants survive this onsalught without raising energy prices to &#8220;green&#8221; levels? That is where responsible government steps in, and channels the inventiveness of the business and scientific community into non-heat, non pollution energy competitive with fossil-fuel burners in the real world. The world where we breath the products of coal-fired stacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
