<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;A strong message to Black Street&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/a-strong-message-to-black-street/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/a-strong-message-to-black-street/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 05:03:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd Martin</title>
		<link>http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/a-strong-message-to-black-street/comment-page-1/#comment-885</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/?p=2730#comment-885</guid>
		<description>Are you seriously equating a profession with a race? Your example fails on its premise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you seriously equating a profession with a race? Your example fails on its premise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Strong Message to Blacks &#171; Trey Givens</title>
		<link>http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/a-strong-message-to-black-street/comment-page-1/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>A Strong Message to Blacks &#171; Trey Givens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/?p=2730#comment-875</guid>
		<description>[...] Alex Epstein explains why this headline and others like it should piss you off. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alex Epstein explains why this headline and others like it should piss you off. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-07-15 &#124; Yostivanich.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/a-strong-message-to-black-street/comment-page-1/#comment-874</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-07-15 &#124; Yostivanich.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/?p=2730#comment-874</guid>
		<description>[...] “A strong message to Black Street” — VOICES for REASON &quot;Think about what this headline implies. The conviction of one particular financier is regarded as a message to all financiers. That is outrageous.&quot; Thought I would make a note to those that think I only disagree with blog, I agree with this statement. (tags: politics libertarian media journalism crime) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “A strong message to Black Street” — VOICES for REASON &quot;Think about what this headline implies. The conviction of one particular financier is regarded as a message to all financiers. That is outrageous.&quot; Thought I would make a note to those that think I only disagree with blog, I agree with this statement. (tags: politics libertarian media journalism crime) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Fitzgibbon</title>
		<link>http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/a-strong-message-to-black-street/comment-page-1/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Fitzgibbon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 02:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aynrandcenter.org/?p=2730#comment-873</guid>
		<description>Alex, thanks for linking Mr. Peikoff&#039;s essay to your comments.  I loved it! It was obviously written a few years ago, but man is it relevant! My comment: he notes how business must deal in the rational and logical. If only that were true! More and more, I find myslef, as a businessman, dealing with very irrational and non-objective people. It&#039;s very frustrating and such a waste of time. In my industry (independent insurance agent in Ontario, Canada), it&#039;s not enough that government regulates us unreasonably, but our own association has become nothing more than a lobby group for leftist ideals.  Because of the ridiculous position of this association (for example, it is lobbying gov&#039;t to create a law preventing insurance companies from buying independent insurance agents therefore reducing the number of possible buyers for my agency and therefore my agency&#039;s value and the asset I worked so long and so hard to create!), I decided to cancel my membership. Only then did I learn that if I cancel, my staff will no longer have the right to their professional designations that they worked so hard to achieve (hours of classroom work, more hours of study and four 3-hour examinations), and which give them a competitive edge in the marketplace - the reason I hired them! So, even though I detest the political position of the association, I have to remain a member because I value my employees too much to deny them their professional designations and ability for advancement in our industry! It&#039;s unreasonalble and outrageous. Not to mention I have to give money to support a cause I&#039;m diametrically opposed to.

P.s. - please spread the word: gov&#039;t healthcare in Canada is an UNMITIGATED DISASTER - don&#039;t let the anybody tell U.S. citizens otherwise! 

Thanks,
Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, thanks for linking Mr. Peikoff&#8217;s essay to your comments.  I loved it! It was obviously written a few years ago, but man is it relevant! My comment: he notes how business must deal in the rational and logical. If only that were true! More and more, I find myslef, as a businessman, dealing with very irrational and non-objective people. It&#8217;s very frustrating and such a waste of time. In my industry (independent insurance agent in Ontario, Canada), it&#8217;s not enough that government regulates us unreasonably, but our own association has become nothing more than a lobby group for leftist ideals.  Because of the ridiculous position of this association (for example, it is lobbying gov&#8217;t to create a law preventing insurance companies from buying independent insurance agents therefore reducing the number of possible buyers for my agency and therefore my agency&#8217;s value and the asset I worked so long and so hard to create!), I decided to cancel my membership. Only then did I learn that if I cancel, my staff will no longer have the right to their professional designations that they worked so hard to achieve (hours of classroom work, more hours of study and four 3-hour examinations), and which give them a competitive edge in the marketplace &#8211; the reason I hired them! So, even though I detest the political position of the association, I have to remain a member because I value my employees too much to deny them their professional designations and ability for advancement in our industry! It&#8217;s unreasonalble and outrageous. Not to mention I have to give money to support a cause I&#8217;m diametrically opposed to.</p>
<p>P.s. &#8211; please spread the word: gov&#8217;t healthcare in Canada is an UNMITIGATED DISASTER &#8211; don&#8217;t let the anybody tell U.S. citizens otherwise! </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
